Nokia 1.3 Review

• Overview
• Design and Build Quality
• Display
• Performance
• Software and User Interface
• Camera
• Battery Life
• Connectivity and Networking
• Additional Features
• Comparison with Other Related Phones
• Pros and Cons
• Conclusion

Overview

The Nokia 1.3 is an ultra-budget smartphone that offers a compact design, decent screen, and good battery life. However, its performance is lacking, and the camera quality is mediocre. While it may be an affordable option, there are better alternatives available in the market.

Design and Build Quality

The design of the Nokia 1.3 is minimalistic and plain. It features a plastic back that is removable, allowing access to the battery and card slots. However, removing the back cover can be challenging and requires caution to avoid damage. The phone has a compact form factor, similar to the Google Pixel 3, making it easy to hold. Overall, the design is basic and unremarkable.

Display

The Nokia 1.3 features a 5.71-inch IPS LCD screen with a resolution of 720 x 1520 pixels. The display offers good viewing angles and soft colors, making it pleasant to use. The HD+ resolution results in a pixel density of almost 300ppi, which is respectable for a budget device. The screen also provides decent brightness levels, ensuring visibility in various lighting conditions.

Performance

The performance of the Nokia 1.3 is underwhelming. It is equipped with a low-grade Qualcomm 215 processor and only 1GB of RAM, which results in sluggish operation. Even with the 'Go edition' of Android 10, the phone struggles to run smoothly, and loading times can be frustratingly slow. Benchmark apps often fail to run on the device, highlighting its performance limitations.

Software and User Interface

The Nokia 1.3 runs on Android 10 (Go edition) and is part of the Android One program. This means it offers a stock Android experience with minimal bloatware and regular software updates for at least two years. While the software is relatively clean and clutter-free, the limited hardware capabilities of the device still hinder its overall performance.

Camera

The camera quality of the Nokia 1.3 is average at best. It is equipped with an 8 MP rear camera that features autofocus and an LED flash. The camera performance in well-lit conditions is acceptable, but it struggles in low-light situations, resulting in grainy and noisy images. The 5 MP front camera is sufficient for basic selfies but lacks detail and sharpness.

Battery Life

The Nokia 1.3 is powered by a removable 3000 mAh Li-Po battery. The battery life is one of the device's strengths, offering good longevity for everyday use. With moderate usage, the phone can easily last a full day before requiring a recharge. The removable battery allows users to carry a spare if needed, which can be convenient for those who require extended battery life.

Connectivity and Networking

The Nokia 1.3 supports standard connectivity options such as Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Bluetooth 4.2, and GPS. However, it lacks NFC, which may be a drawback for users who rely on contactless payments or other NFC-enabled features. The device also includes a 3.5mm headphone jack for audio connectivity. Overall, the connectivity options are sufficient for everyday use.

Additional Features

Comparison with Other Related Phones

When compared to other devices in its price range, the Nokia 1.3 falls short in terms of performance and camera quality. Alternatives such as the Xiaomi Redmi 9A or the Moto E6 offer better overall specifications and performance at a similar price point. These devices provide a more satisfactory user experience and better value for money.

Pros and Cons

Conclusion

Overall, the Nokia 1.3 is an affordable smartphone that offers a compact design, decent screen, and good battery life. However, its performance is lacking, and the camera quality is mediocre. While it may be suitable for those on a tight budget, there are better alternatives available in the market that provide improved specifications and overall user experience. If performance and camera quality are important factors, it is advisable to consider other options within a similar price range.